ZSL vs. SPMO
ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSL returned -38.80%/yr vs 20.66%/yr for SPMO. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. ZSL charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
ZSL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -40.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSL has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of -38.80%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.66% annualized return.
ZSL
- 1D
- 6.92%
- 1M
- 31.50%
- 6M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -40.11%
- 1Y
- -85.47%
- 3Y*
- -63.93%
- 5Y*
- -48.95%
- 10Y*
- -38.80%
SPMO
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 24.83%
- YTD
- 26.03%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 40.56%
- 5Y*
- 21.26%
- 10Y*
- 20.66%
ZSL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -40.11% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | -2.04% | -74.44% | -27.76% | 18.15% | -18.99% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 26.03% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSL and SPMO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSL
SPMO
ZSL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZSL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.29 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 2.74 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 9.73 | -10.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZSL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -30.95% | -69.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.81% | -12.70% | -81.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.40% | -20.13% | -78.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.06% | -22.74% | -76.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.82% | -30.95% | -68.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -7.38% | -92.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.39% | -4.59% | -91.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.67% | 3.56% | +68.11% |
Volatility
ZSL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a higher volatility of 28.50% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 12.53%. This indicates that ZSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.50% | 12.53% | +15.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.91% | 19.77% | +83.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.96% | 22.23% | +101.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.52% | 20.25% | +55.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.88% | 20.80% | +45.08% |
ZSL vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSL and SPMO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSL has higher volatility (28.50%) compared to SPMO (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.66% vs -38.80% for ZSL. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 12.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.66% return vs -38.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.
ZSL is categorized as Silver, while SPMO is Momentum. ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSL and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer