ZSL vs. BITU
ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZSL returned -92.31% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. ZSL charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.
Performance
ZSL vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -59.81% return, which is significantly lower than BITU's -52.92% return.
ZSL
- 1D
- 5.33%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- -59.81%
- 6M
- -75.78%
- 1Y
- -92.31%
- 3Y*
- -69.67%
- 5Y*
- -51.93%
- 10Y*
- -43.74%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSL vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -59.81% | -87.29% | -30.83% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSL and BITU is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSL vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
ZSL
BITU
ZSL vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSL | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.93 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.47 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSL | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | -0.84 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.35 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
ZSL vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSL | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -78.94% | -21.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.55% | -78.94% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -78.94% | -21.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.39% | -34.49% | -61.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.23% | 49.84% | +18.39% |
Volatility
ZSL vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a higher volatility of 32.31% compared to Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) at 18.99%. This indicates that ZSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSL | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.31% | 18.99% | +13.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.86% | 69.41% | +36.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.48% | 87.00% | +32.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.07% | 97.45% | -23.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.20% | 97.45% | -32.25% |
ZSL vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSL vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSL and BITU have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSL has higher volatility (32.31%) compared to BITU (18.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs BITU's -78.94%.
On 1-year performance, BITU leads with -73.07% vs -92.31% for ZSL. On fees, BITU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITU has been the lower-risk option at 18.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITU has performed better with a -73.07% return vs -92.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.
ZSL is categorized as Silver, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 0.95% for BITU.
ZSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSL and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer