PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSL vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSL vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -59.81% return, which is significantly lower than BITU's -52.92% return.


ZSL

1D
5.33%
1M
-6.86%
YTD
-59.81%
6M
-75.78%
1Y
-92.31%
3Y*
-69.67%
5Y*
-51.93%
10Y*
-43.74%

BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSL vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZSL
ProShares UltraShort Silver
-59.81%-87.29%-30.83%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSL and BITU is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSL vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSL
ZSL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ZSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSL vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSLBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.84

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.93

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.47

+0.11

ZSL vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is comparable to the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSL and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSLBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

-0.84

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

-0.35

-0.32

Drawdowns

ZSL vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSLBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-78.94%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.55%

-78.94%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-78.94%

-21.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.39%

-34.49%

-61.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.23%

49.84%

+18.39%

Volatility

ZSL vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a higher volatility of 32.31% compared to Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) at 18.99%. This indicates that ZSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSLBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.31%

18.99%

+13.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.86%

69.41%

+36.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.48%

87.00%

+32.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.07%

97.45%

-23.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.20%

97.45%

-32.25%

ZSL vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSL vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%.


PositionTTM20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%
ZSL
ProShares UltraShort Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSL and BITU have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZSL has higher volatility (32.31%) compared to BITU (18.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs BITU's -78.94%.

On 1-year performance, BITU leads with -73.07% vs -92.31% for ZSL. On fees, BITU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITU has been the lower-risk option at 18.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITU has performed better with a -73.07% return vs -92.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.

ZSL is categorized as Silver, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 0.95% for BITU.

ZSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSL and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer