PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZS vs. SRAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZS vs. SRAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -35.91% return, which is significantly higher than SRAD's -42.45% return.


ZS

1D
-7.42%
1M
3.10%
YTD
-35.91%
6M
-40.36%
1Y
-50.83%
3Y*
0.41%
5Y*
-4.79%
10Y*

SRAD

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.17%
YTD
-42.45%
6M
-37.79%
1Y
-43.02%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZS vs. SRAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-35.91%24.67%-18.57%98.00%-65.18%16.51%
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG
-42.45%37.08%56.92%10.94%-43.31%-29.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZS and SRAD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between ZS and SRAD has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZS:

$23.17B

SRAD:

$4.07B

EPS

ZS:

-$0.49

SRAD:

$0.22

PS Ratio

ZS:

7.22

SRAD:

3.23

PB Ratio

ZS:

9.79

SRAD:

4.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZS:

$3.17B

SRAD:

$1.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZS:

$2.43B

SRAD:

$507.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZS:

$69.08M

SRAD:

$365.19M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZS vs. SRAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SRAD
SRAD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SRAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRAD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SRAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRAD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZS vs. SRAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSSRADDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

-0.91

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.08

-1.17

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.70

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.28

-0.07

ZS vs. SRAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZS Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the SRAD Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZS and SRAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSSRADDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

-0.91

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

-0.23

+0.57

Drawdowns

ZS vs. SRAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than SRAD's maximum drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and SRAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSSRADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.41%

-72.74%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.89%

-61.15%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.89%

-61.15%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.91%

-56.97%

-3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.57%

-45.31%

+12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.23%

33.34%

+1.89%

Volatility

ZS vs. SRAD - Volatility Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a higher volatility of 45.01% compared to Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) at 10.51%. This indicates that ZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSSRADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.01%

10.51%

+34.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.92%

42.29%

+14.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.55%

47.29%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.05%

52.72%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.42%

52.72%

+5.70%

Dividends

ZS vs. SRAD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZS nor SRAD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ZS vs. SRAD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zscaler, Inc. and Sportradar Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
850.48M
352.22M
(ZS) Total Revenue
(SRAD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZS vs. SRAD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zscaler, Inc. and Sportradar Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.4%
16.4%
Portfolio components
ZS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

SRAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a gross profit of 57.79M and revenue of 352.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

ZS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

SRAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported an operating income of 25.86M and revenue of 352.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

ZS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.

SRAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a net income of -6.39M and revenue of 352.22M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZS and SRAD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZS has higher volatility (45.01%) compared to SRAD (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZS dropped -76.41% vs SRAD's -72.74%.

ZS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZS and SRAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer