PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRAD vs. APH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SRAD vs. APH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRAD achieves a -42.45% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 10.03% return.


SRAD

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.17%
YTD
-42.45%
6M
-37.79%
1Y
-43.02%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
10Y*

APH

1D
1.41%
1M
4.29%
YTD
10.03%
6M
5.29%
1Y
65.39%
3Y*
57.73%
5Y*
35.57%
10Y*
27.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRAD vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG
-42.45%37.08%56.92%10.94%-43.31%-29.86%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
10.03%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%15.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SRAD and APH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.33

The correlation between SRAD and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SRAD:

$4.07B

APH:

$191.39B

EPS

SRAD:

$0.22

APH:

$4.58

PE Ratio

SRAD:

61.60

APH:

32.37

PEG Ratio

SRAD:

0.66

APH:

1.08

PS Ratio

SRAD:

3.23

APH:

7.35

PB Ratio

SRAD:

4.53

APH:

13.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

SRAD:

$1.33B

APH:

$25.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SRAD:

$507.27M

APH:

$9.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

SRAD:

$365.19M

APH:

$7.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRAD vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRAD
SRAD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SRAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRAD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SRAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRAD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRAD vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRADAPHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.91

1.63

-2.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.17

2.05

-3.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.29

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

2.35

-3.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.28

6.16

-7.44

SRAD vs. APH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRAD and APH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRADAPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

1.63

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.63

-0.86

Drawdowns

SRAD vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRAD drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRAD and APH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRADAPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-63.41%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.15%

-28.19%

-32.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.15%

-28.19%

-32.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.97%

-10.56%

-46.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.31%

-13.56%

-31.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.34%

10.74%

+22.60%

Volatility

SRAD vs. APH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is 10.51%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 15.93%. This indicates that SRAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRADAPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.51%

15.93%

-5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.29%

36.05%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.29%

40.38%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.72%

30.42%

+22.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.72%

27.75%

+24.97%

Dividends

SRAD vs. APH - Dividend Comparison

SRAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.56%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SRAD vs. APH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sportradar Group AG and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
352.22M
7.62B
(SRAD) Total Revenue
(APH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SRAD vs. APH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sportradar Group AG and Amphenol Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
16.4%
36.8%
Portfolio components
SRAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a gross profit of 57.79M and revenue of 352.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

SRAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported an operating income of 25.86M and revenue of 352.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

SRAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a net income of -6.39M and revenue of 352.22M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SRAD and APH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APH has higher volatility (15.93%) compared to SRAD (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRAD dropped -72.74% vs APH's -63.41%.

APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRAD and APH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer