SRAD vs. SGHC
SRAD (Sportradar Group AG) and SGHC (Super Group (SGHC) Limited) are both stocks. SRAD operates in Software - Application (Technology), while SGHC operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, SRAD returned 3.25%/yr vs 64.50%/yr for SGHC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRAD vs. SGHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRAD achieves a -43.37% return, which is significantly lower than SGHC's 9.93% return.
SRAD
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- -43.37%
- 6M
- -41.09%
- 1Y
- -42.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGHC
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 52.45%
- 3Y*
- 64.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRAD vs. SGHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRAD Sportradar Group AG | -43.37% | 37.08% | 56.92% | 10.94% | -21.20% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 9.93% | 95.00% | 107.65% | 5.67% | -63.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRAD and SGHC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
SRAD:
$4.01B
SGHC:
$6.44B
SRAD:
$0.22
SGHC:
$0.40
SRAD:
60.61
SGHC:
31.56
SRAD:
0.65
SGHC:
1.34
SRAD:
3.18
SGHC:
2.99
SRAD:
4.46
SGHC:
9.42
SRAD:
$1.33B
SGHC:
$2.15B
SRAD:
$507.27M
SGHC:
$617.43M
SRAD:
$365.19M
SGHC:
$394.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRAD vs. SGHC — Risk / Return Rank
SRAD
SGHC
SRAD vs. SGHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRAD | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | 1.14 | -2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | 1.83 | -3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.22 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 1.40 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 3.21 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRAD | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 1.14 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.22 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
SRAD vs. SGHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRAD drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SGHC drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRAD and SGHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRAD | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -76.02% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.15% | -37.67% | -23.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.15% | -37.67% | -23.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.66% | -8.22% | -49.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -45.81% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.54% | 16.37% | +17.17% |
Volatility
SRAD vs. SGHC - Volatility Comparison
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) have volatilities of 10.47% and 10.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRAD | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 10.29% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.31% | 30.54% | +11.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.31% | 46.38% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.71% | 59.60% | -6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.71% | 59.60% | -6.89% |
Dividends
SRAD vs. SGHC - Dividend Comparison
SRAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 3.30% | 1.34% | 4.01% |
SRAD Sportradar Group AG | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SRAD vs. SGHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sportradar Group AG and Super Group (SGHC) Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SRAD vs. SGHC - Profitability Comparison
SRAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a gross profit of 57.79M and revenue of 352.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
SGHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.
SRAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported an operating income of 25.86M and revenue of 352.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
SGHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
SRAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sportradar Group AG reported a net income of -6.39M and revenue of 352.22M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
SGHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SRAD and SGHC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRAD has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to SGHC (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRAD dropped -72.74% vs SGHC's -76.02%.
SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRAD and SGHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer