ZIVO vs. EAT
ZIVO (ZIVO Bioscience, Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. ZIVO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ZIVO returned 28.41%/yr vs 18.44%/yr for EAT. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZIVO vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIVO achieves a -54.02% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 48.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ZIVO has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 28.41%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 18.44% annualized return.
ZIVO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -23.81%
- 6M
- -61.90%
- YTD
- -54.02%
- 1Y
- -59.88%
- 3Y*
- -30.66%
- 5Y*
- -28.23%
- 10Y*
- 28.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
EAT
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- 6M
- 35.49%
- YTD
- 48.90%
- 1Y
- 37.07%
- 3Y*
- 76.49%
- 5Y*
- 31.50%
- 10Y*
- 18.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $218.38M | $200.49M | $168.31M | |
| $4.68K | $3.81K | $4.67K |
ZIVO vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIVO ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. | -54.02% | -59.53% | 1,691.67% | -92.00% | -12.89% | 1,813.33% | -11.76% | 30.77% | 44.44% | -5.26% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 48.90% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIVO and EAT is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2012 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
ZIVO:
$15.55M
EAT:
$9.17B
ZIVO:
-$1.70
EAT:
$10.20
ZIVO:
131.10
EAT:
1.69
ZIVO:
$119.03K
EAT:
$5.73B
ZIVO:
$39.21K
EAT:
$3.45B
ZIVO:
-$6.59M
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVO vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVO
EAT
ZIVO vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIVO | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.97 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 2.42 | -3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIVO vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVO drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVO and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVO | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.52% | -88.40% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.85% | -36.79% | -57.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.18% | -45.92% | -50.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.52% | -59.80% | -38.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.52% | -84.94% | -13.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.77% | 0.00% | -87.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.98% | -24.27% | -39.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.67% | 14.77% | +42.90% |
Volatility
ZIVO vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO) has a higher volatility of 46.24% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 10.76%. This indicates that ZIVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVO | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.24% | 10.76% | +35.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 139.92% | 36.24% | +103.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.49% | 47.63% | +137.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.36% | 48.73% | +93.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,082.66% | 55.26% | +1,027.40% |
Dividends
ZIVO vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZIVO nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
ZIVO ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZIVO vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIVO and EAT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIVO has higher volatility (46.24%) compared to EAT (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIVO dropped -98.52% vs EAT's -88.40%.
EAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIVO and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer