ZETA vs. DRS
ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.) and DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. ZETA operates in Software - Application (Technology), while DRS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, ZETA returned 29.75%/yr vs 40.85%/yr for DRS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZETA vs. DRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZETA achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 37.48% return.
ZETA
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 15.01%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 62.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DRS
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 37.48%
- 6M
- 39.15%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 40.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZETA vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | -2.85% | 13.12% | 103.97% | 7.96% | -3.54% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 37.48% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZETA and DRS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
ZETA:
-$0.14
DRS:
$1.44
ZETA:
2.28
DRS:
2.55
ZETA:
$1.44B
DRS:
$3.70B
ZETA:
$881.70M
DRS:
$894.00M
ZETA:
$50.09M
DRS:
$433.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZETA vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank
ZETA
DRS
ZETA vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZETA | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.07 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 0.14 | +3.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZETA vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZETA drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZETA and DRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZETA | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -32.48% | -37.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.37% | -32.48% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.01% | -32.48% | -37.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.19% | -6.06% | -40.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.13% | -7.25% | -26.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.85% | 16.06% | +3.79% |
Volatility
ZETA vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a higher volatility of 24.86% compared to Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) at 14.30%. This indicates that ZETA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZETA | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.86% | 14.30% | +10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.84% | 32.06% | +16.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.75% | 40.81% | +32.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.06% | 38.77% | +33.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.06% | 38.77% | +33.29% |
Dividends
ZETA vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison
ZETA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.77% | 1.06% |
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZETA vs. DRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zeta Global Holdings Corp. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZETA vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison
ZETA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 233.86M and revenue of 396.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
ZETA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -18.84M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
ZETA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -13.25M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZETA and DRS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZETA has higher volatility (24.86%) compared to DRS (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZETA dropped -70.01% vs DRS's -32.48%.
ZETA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZETA and DRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer