PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEB.TO vs. RBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZEB.TO is traded in CAD, while RBC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RBC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly lower than RBC's 31.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO has underperformed RBC with an annualized return of 15.82%, while RBC has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.


ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%

RBC

1D
1.42%
1M
0.46%
YTD
31.93%
6M
32.81%
1Y
58.04%
3Y*
42.67%
5Y*
28.57%
10Y*
24.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
31.93%43.03%14.02%33.09%11.62%16.26%12.17%15.73%12.51%27.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEB.TO and RBC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2009

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEB.TO vs. RBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RBC
RBC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEB.TORBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.39

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.17

5.36

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.84

15.19

+15.66

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.79, which is higher than the RBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEB.TO and RBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEB.TORBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.79

2.30

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

0.95

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.67

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.72

+0.16

Drawdowns

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum RBC drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and RBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEB.TORBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-50.85%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-10.88%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-18.09%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-32.51%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-50.85%

+11.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-4.45%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-7.67%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.83%

-1.87%

Volatility

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) is 4.89%, while RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that ZEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEB.TORBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

11.22%

-6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

19.60%

-8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

25.37%

-12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

30.09%

-16.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

36.29%

-19.38%

Dividends

ZEB.TO vs. RBC - Dividend Comparison

ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while RBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.49%4.10%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEB.TO and RBC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and RBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer