ZBH vs. XLV
ZBH (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, ZBH returned -1.64%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for XLV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZBH vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of -1.64%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.
ZBH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- -12.72%
- 5Y*
- -9.68%
- 10Y*
- -1.64%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ZBH vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | -1.23% | -14.03% | -12.46% | -3.81% | 4.24% | -17.02% | 3.77% | 45.37% | -13.30% | 17.86% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZBH and XLV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2001 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ZBH and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZBH vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
ZBH
XLV
ZBH vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZBH | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 1.38 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 3.31 | -3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZBH vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZBH | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.03% | -39.17% | -25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -10.47% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.94% | -17.11% | -26.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.62% | -17.11% | -31.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.14% | -28.40% | -23.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.73% | -3.59% | -43.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.08% | -7.12% | -12.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.04% | 4.37% | +8.67% |
Volatility
ZBH vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.90%. This indicates that ZBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZBH | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 4.90% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 10.60% | +9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.57% | 15.03% | +15.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 14.75% | +11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.45% | 16.58% | +11.87% |
Dividends
ZBH vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
ZBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than XLV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 1.08% | 1.07% | 0.91% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZBH and XLV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZBH has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBH dropped -65.03% vs XLV's -39.17%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZBH and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer