ZBH vs. XLK
ZBH (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, ZBH returned -1.43%/yr vs 25.40%/yr for XLK. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZBH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBH achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 27.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBH has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of -1.43%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.40% annualized return.
ZBH
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- -0.90%
- 3Y*
- -13.60%
- 5Y*
- -10.15%
- 10Y*
- -1.43%
XLK
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 27.45%
- 6M
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 48.85%
- 3Y*
- 30.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.22%
- 10Y*
- 25.40%
ZBH vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 0.99% | -14.03% | -12.46% | -3.81% | 4.24% | -17.02% | 3.77% | 45.37% | -13.30% | 17.86% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 27.45% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZBH and XLK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2001 | 0.40 |
The correlation between ZBH and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZBH vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
ZBH
XLK
ZBH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZBH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.08 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 9.79 | -9.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZBH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBH drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBH and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZBH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.03% | -82.05% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -15.92% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.94% | -25.66% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.53% | -33.56% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.14% | -33.56% | -18.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.53% | -7.54% | -37.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -34.90% | +14.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.36% | 5.00% | +8.36% |
Volatility
ZBH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) is 7.13%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 12.50%. This indicates that ZBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZBH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 12.50% | -5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.70% | 19.62% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.72% | 23.47% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 25.37% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 24.71% | +3.76% |
Dividends
ZBH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
ZBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 1.06% | 1.07% | 0.91% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZBH and XLK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to ZBH (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBH dropped -65.03% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZBH and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer