YNOT vs. ARMH
YNOT (Horizon Digital Frontier ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YNOT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
YNOT vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
YNOT
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- -5.46%
- 1M
- -33.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YNOT vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
YNOT Horizon Digital Frontier ETF | -6.49% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -16.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between YNOT and ARMH is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YNOT vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
YNOT
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YNOT vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YNOT | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YNOT vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YNOT | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.73% | -41.19% | +24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -41.19% | +29.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -17.23% | +13.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | — | — |
Volatility
YNOT vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YNOT | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 103.28% | -78.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 103.28% | -78.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 103.28% | -78.65% |
YNOT vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
YNOT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
YNOT vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither YNOT nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
YNOT and ARMH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for YNOT.
YNOT and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YNOT and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for YNOT and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer