PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YNOT vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YNOT vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNOT achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than BCDF's 3.23% return.


YNOT

1D
-1.88%
1M
8.38%
YTD
21.63%
6M
20.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCDF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
3.23%
6M
4.02%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YNOT vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YNOT and BCDF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.39

YNOT vs. BCDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YNOT
BCDF

Technology

47.3%
9.7%

Industrials

17.2%
0.4%

Communication Services

13.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Basic Materials

8.4%

-

Financial Services

1.9%
80.2%

Utilities

1.4%
4.7%

Healthcare

0.8%
0.0%

Energy

0.7%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

YNOT
47.3%
BCDF
9.7%

Industrials

YNOT
17.2%
BCDF
0.4%

Communication Services

YNOT
13.4%
BCDF
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

YNOT
8.9%
BCDF

-

Basic Materials

YNOT
8.4%
BCDF

-

Financial Services

YNOT
1.9%
BCDF
80.2%

Utilities

YNOT
1.4%
BCDF
4.7%

Healthcare

YNOT
0.8%
BCDF
0.0%

Energy

YNOT
0.7%
BCDF
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

YNOT

-

BCDF

-

Real Estate

YNOT

-

BCDF
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YNOT vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YNOT

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNOT vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YNOT vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YNOTBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.39

+1.38

Drawdowns

YNOT vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and BCDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YNOTBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.73%

-27.70%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-7.63%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-9.83%

+6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

YNOT vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YNOTBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.11%

14.76%

+8.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.11%

16.94%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

16.94%

+6.17%

YNOT vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

YNOT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

YNOT vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.45%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YNOT and BCDF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YNOT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YNOT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

YNOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BCDF is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YNOT and 0.85% for BCDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YNOT and BCDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer