PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YNOT vs. HBTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YNOT vs. HBTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNOT achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than HBTA's 14.07% return.


YNOT

1D
-1.88%
1M
8.38%
YTD
21.63%
6M
20.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBTA

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.20%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.43%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YNOT vs. HBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
21.63%11.82%
HBTA
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
14.07%13.71%

Correlation

The correlation between YNOT and HBTA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YNOT vs. HBTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YNOT

HBTA
HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNOT vs. HBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YNOT vs. HBTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YNOTHBTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.91

+0.86

Drawdowns

YNOT vs. HBTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, smaller than the maximum HBTA drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and HBTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YNOTHBTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.73%

-26.73%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.68%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-4.22%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

Volatility

YNOT vs. HBTA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YNOTHBTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.11%

17.18%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.11%

24.85%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

24.85%

-1.74%

YNOT vs. HBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

YNOT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HBTA's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

YNOT vs. HBTA - Dividend Comparison

YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM2025
HBTA
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
0.56%0.64%
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YNOT and HBTA have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YNOT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YNOT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HBTA.

HBTA has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

YNOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while HBTA is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YNOT and 0.85% for HBTA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YNOT and HBTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer