YMM vs. PLMR
YMM (Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.) and PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. YMM operates in Software - Application (Technology), while PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, YMM returned 14.68%/yr vs 23.25%/yr for PLMR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
YMM vs. PLMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMM achieves a -14.41% return, which is significantly higher than PLMR's -24.74% return.
YMM
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -21.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLMR
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- -24.74%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -42.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.25%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
YMM vs. PLMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | -14.41% | 0.79% | 57.39% | -12.38% | -4.42% | -61.07% |
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -24.74% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMM and PLMR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between YMM and PLMR shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
YMM:
$9.49B
PLMR:
$2.77B
YMM:
$3.93
PLMR:
$7.18
YMM:
2.31
PLMR:
14.12
YMM:
0.01
PLMR:
0.32
YMM:
0.76
PLMR:
2.85
YMM:
0.24
PLMR:
2.89
YMM:
$12.58B
PLMR:
$977.99M
YMM:
$7.94B
PLMR:
$401.29M
YMM:
$4.33B
PLMR:
$210.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMM vs. PLMR — Risk / Return Rank
YMM
PLMR
YMM vs. PLMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | -1.17 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | -1.69 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.79 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -1.03 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | -1.53 | +0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | -1.17 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.56 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
YMM vs. PLMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMM drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, which is greater than PLMR's maximum drawdown of -62.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMM and PLMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.37% | -62.86% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.92% | -40.96% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.92% | -42.27% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.73% | -42.27% | -13.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -28.80% | -27.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.91% | 28.84% | -4.93% |
Volatility
YMM vs. PLMR - Volatility Comparison
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) at 9.65%. This indicates that YMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 9.65% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 23.20% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.66% | 36.07% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 42.60% | +30.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 47.91% | +25.18% |
Dividends
YMM vs. PLMR - Dividend Comparison
YMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while PLMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 1.98% | 1.79% | 1.33% |
Financials
YMM vs. PLMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. and Palomar Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
YMM vs. PLMR - Profitability Comparison
YMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 2.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.
PLMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
YMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported an operating income of 983.93M and revenue of 2.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.8%.
PLMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
YMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported a net income of 984.91M and revenue of 2.83B, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.
PLMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
YMM and PLMR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YMM has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to PLMR (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMM dropped -78.37% vs PLMR's -62.86%.
YMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMM and PLMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer