PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMM vs. ACMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YMM vs. ACMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMM achieves a -14.41% return, which is significantly lower than ACMR's 125.25% return.


YMM

1D
-4.42%
1M
5.45%
YTD
-14.41%
6M
-18.87%
1Y
-21.38%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*

ACMR

1D
-3.33%
1M
73.45%
YTD
125.25%
6M
161.81%
1Y
280.56%
3Y*
107.40%
5Y*
26.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMM vs. ACMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
YMM
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.
-14.41%0.79%57.39%-12.38%-4.42%-61.07%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
125.25%161.26%-22.72%153.44%-72.87%-16.86%

Correlation

The correlation between YMM and ACMR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YMM:

$9.49B

ACMR:

$6.20B

EPS

YMM:

$3.93

ACMR:

$1.33

PE Ratio

YMM:

2.31

ACMR:

66.99

PEG Ratio

YMM:

0.01

ACMR:

2.34

PS Ratio

YMM:

0.76

ACMR:

6.35

PB Ratio

YMM:

0.24

ACMR:

3.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

YMM:

$12.58B

ACMR:

$960.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

YMM:

$7.94B

ACMR:

$424.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

YMM:

$4.33B

ACMR:

$162.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMM vs. ACMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMM
YMM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
YMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
YMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ACMR
ACMR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ACMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ACMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMM vs. ACMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMMACMRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.54

3.79

-4.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.54

3.38

-3.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.48

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

6.10

-6.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.90

15.65

-16.55

YMM vs. ACMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMM Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the ACMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMM and ACMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMMACMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

3.79

-4.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.67

-0.88

Drawdowns

YMM vs. ACMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMM drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, smaller than the maximum ACMR drawdown of -87.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMM and ACMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMMACMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.37%

-87.23%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.92%

-46.34%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.92%

-58.42%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.73%

-4.31%

-51.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-39.31%

-16.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.91%

18.02%

+5.89%

Volatility

YMM vs. ACMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) is 14.07%, while ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) has a volatility of 25.46%. This indicates that YMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMMACMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.07%

25.46%

-11.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

55.39%

-31.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.66%

74.63%

-34.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.09%

80.33%

-7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.09%

83.32%

-10.23%

Dividends

YMM vs. ACMR - Dividend Comparison

YMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while ACMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
YMM
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.
1.98%1.79%1.33%

Financials

YMM vs. ACMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. and ACM Research, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
2.83B
231.26M
(YMM) Total Revenue
(ACMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YMM vs. ACMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. and ACM Research, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
73.5%
46.4%
Portfolio components
YMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 2.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

ACMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.24M and revenue of 231.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

YMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported an operating income of 983.93M and revenue of 2.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.8%.

ACMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.18M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

YMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported a net income of 984.91M and revenue of 2.83B, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.

ACMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a net income of 17.31M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YMM and ACMR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACMR has higher volatility (25.46%) compared to YMM (14.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMM dropped -78.37% vs ACMR's -87.23%.

ACMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMM and ACMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer