PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.15% return.


YMAX

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.93%
6M
5.27%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.68%

XOMO

1D
-0.09%
1M
10.85%
6M
7.87%
YTD
20.15%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$559.24K$694.66K$715.05K
$9.31M$11.31M$14.54M

YMAX vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
0.68%6.04%26.90%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
20.15%6.90%7.53%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and XOMO is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024

-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between YMAX and XOMO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAX vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAXXOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.26

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.74

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

4.35

-4.55

YMAX vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and XOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and XOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAXXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-18.90%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

-17.25%

-8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

-7.65%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-7.50%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

6.89%

+4.83%

Volatility

YMAX vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.21%. This indicates that YMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAXXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

6.21%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

17.24%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

20.67%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

19.19%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

19.19%

+4.32%

YMAX vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.74%, more than XOMO's 37.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.07%31.64%26.94%5.13%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
71.74%78.70%44.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX and XOMO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to XOMO (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs XOMO's -18.90%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.81% vs -2.39% for YMAX. On fees, XOMO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.81% return vs -2.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOMO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 71.74%, compared with 37.07% for XOMO.

Their fees differ too: 1.33% for YMAX and 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX and XOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer