YMAX vs. QDTE
YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAX returned -4.08% vs 25.08% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. YMAX charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
YMAX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 10.53% return.
YMAX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- -4.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.95%
QDTE
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 25.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.47M | $18.74M | $19.73M | |
| $9.76M | $11.55M | $14.55M |
YMAX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | -1.07% | 6.04% | 14.53% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 10.53% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAX and QDTE is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between YMAX and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
YMAX vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YMAX
QDTE
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
YMAX
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
YMAX
QDTE
-
Communication Services
YMAX
QDTE
-
Financial Services
YMAX
QDTE
Industrials
YMAX
QDTE
-
Healthcare
YMAX
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
YMAX
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
YMAX
QDTE
-
Real Estate
YMAX
QDTE
-
Energy
YMAX
QDTE
-
Utilities
YMAX
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
YMAX
QDTE
YMAX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YMAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.22 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.23 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 7.58 | -8.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YMAX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -22.86% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.13% | -10.20% | -15.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.29% | -5.34% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -3.17% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.72% | 2.99% | +8.73% |
Volatility
YMAX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) is 6.33%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that YMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 6.78% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.28% | 14.80% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.24% | 18.06% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 19.17% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 19.17% | +4.33% |
YMAX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.00%, more than QDTE's 46.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.41% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 73.00% | 78.70% | 44.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAX and QDTE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to YMAX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 25.08% vs -4.08% for YMAX. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YMAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 25.08% return vs -4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDTE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for YMAX.
YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 73.00%, compared with 46.41% for QDTE.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for YMAX and 0.95% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMAX and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer