YMAR vs. BIL
YMAR (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YMAR returned 6.42%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. YMAR charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
YMAR vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAR achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return.
YMAR
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 13.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
YMAR vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YMAR FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 5.63% | 18.55% | 3.12% | 16.31% | -8.46% | 3.11% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.67% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAR and BIL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAR vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
YMAR
BIL
YMAR vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YMAR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -169.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 87.16 | -85.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 352.24 | -348.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 2,793.11 | -2,776.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YMAR vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAR and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -0.78% | -21.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -0.01% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.37% | -0.01% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.60% | -0.09% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -0.26% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.00% | +0.80% |
Volatility
YMAR vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that YMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 0.07% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.57% | 0.14% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.09% | 0.20% | +6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 0.26% | +11.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 0.26% | +10.98% |
YMAR vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAR vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
YMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
YMAR FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAR and BIL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YMAR has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAR dropped -22.60% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 5-year performance, YMAR leads with 6.42% vs 3.45% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YMAR has performed better with a 6.42% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YMAR.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for YMAR.
YMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BIL is Government Bonds. YMAR tracks iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YMAR and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMAR and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer