PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAR vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAR vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAR achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.


YMAR

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.52%
YTD
5.29%
6M
6.66%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAR vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
YMAR
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
5.29%18.55%3.12%16.31%-8.46%3.24%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%18.46%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAR and ITOT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021

0.72

The correlation between YMAR and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAR vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAR
ITOT

Financial Services

24.7%
12.1%

Industrials

19.8%
9.5%

Healthcare

10.6%
9.0%

Technology

10.3%
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.9%
2.1%

Communication Services

4.5%
10.3%

Energy

4.0%
3.7%

Utilities

4.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Financial Services

YMAR
24.7%
ITOT
12.1%

Industrials

YMAR
19.8%
ITOT
9.5%

Healthcare

YMAR
10.6%
ITOT
9.0%

Technology

YMAR
10.3%
ITOT
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

YMAR
7.7%
ITOT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

YMAR
6.7%
ITOT
4.7%

Basic Materials

YMAR
5.9%
ITOT
2.1%

Communication Services

YMAR
4.5%
ITOT
10.3%

Energy

YMAR
4.0%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

YMAR
4.0%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

YMAR
1.9%
ITOT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAR vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAR
YMAR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
YMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAR vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMARITOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

2.32

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.17

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.17

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.21

14.57

+1.64

YMAR vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAR and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMARITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.32

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.57

+0.04

Drawdowns

YMAR vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAR and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMARITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-55.20%

+32.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-8.90%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.37%

-19.44%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-25.36%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.73%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-6.97%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.94%

-1.13%

Volatility

YMAR vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) is 2.03%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that YMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMARITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

2.99%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

9.13%

-3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.92%

12.20%

-5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

17.36%

-6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

18.26%

-7.00%

YMAR vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAR vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

YMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
YMAR
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAR and ITOT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to YMAR (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAR dropped -22.60% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.69% vs 6.23% for YMAR. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, YMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YMAR.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for YMAR.

YMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ITOT is Large Cap Growth Equities. YMAR tracks iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, while ITOT tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YMAR and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAR and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer