YMAR vs. AIOO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

YMAR (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. YMAR is passively managed, while AIOO is actively managed. Over the past year, YMAR returned 13.71% vs 5.20% for AIOO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAR charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.

Performance

YMAR vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAR achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.52% return.

YMAR

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 5.46%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 1Y: 13.71%
• 3Y*: 10.26%
• 5Y*: 6.84%
• 10Y*: —

AIOO

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 2.31%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 1Y: 5.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAR vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YMAR FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	6.52%	5.91%
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.52%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAR and AIOO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.54

The correlation between YMAR and AIOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YMAR vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAR

YMAR Risk / Return Rank: 84
YMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
YMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
YMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
YMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
YMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AIOO

AIOO Risk / Return Rank: 93
AIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAR vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YMAR	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.53	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	3.93	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.49	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	7.05	-2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.20	20.36	-3.16

YMAR vs. AIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the AIOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAR and AIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YMAR vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAR and AIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAR	AIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.60%	-0.74%	-21.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.21%	-0.74%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.02%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-0.18%	-3.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.26%	+0.54%

Volatility

YMAR vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) at 0.66%. This indicates that YMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YMAR	AIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	0.66%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.69%	1.42%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.06%	2.06%	+5.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.35%	2.05%	+9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.19%	2.05%	+9.14%

YMAR vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAR vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither YMAR nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAR and AIOO in my portfolio?

YMAR and AIOO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YMAR or AIOO?

YMAR has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to AIOO (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAR dropped -22.60% vs AIOO's -0.74%.

Which ETF is better, YMAR or AIOO?

On 1-year performance, YMAR leads with 13.71% vs 5.20% for AIOO. On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, AIOO has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YMAR or AIOO?

Over the 1-year period, YMAR has performed better with a 13.71% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAR or AIOO?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAR or AIOO?

YMAR and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between YMAR and AIOO?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YMAR and 0.64% for AIOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.