YMAR vs. ZMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR).
YMAR and ZMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YMAR is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025.
Performance
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAR FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 2.02% | 12.48% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.46% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAR achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly higher than ZMAR's 0.46% return.
YMAR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMAR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YMAR vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank
YMAR
ZMAR
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMAR | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 2.31 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 3.65 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.55 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.74 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 18.69 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMAR | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.31 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.86 | -1.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAR and ZMAR is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither YMAR nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, which is greater than ZMAR's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAR and ZMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAR | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -2.30% | -20.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -1.92% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.65% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -0.25% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.38% | +0.65% |
Volatility
YMAR vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) at 1.19%. This indicates that YMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YMAR | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 1.19% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.97% | 1.67% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 3.11% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 3.21% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 3.21% | +8.15% |