AIOO vs. DMAX
AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) and DMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. AIOO is actively managed, while DMAX is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIOO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DMAX.
Performance
AIOO vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIOO having a 2.26% return and DMAX slightly higher at 2.34%.
AIOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.26% | 2.65% |
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF | 2.34% | 4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIOO and DMAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIOO vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank
AIOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DMAX
AIOO vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIOO | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIOO vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIOO drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum DMAX drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOO and DMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIOO | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -3.37% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.24% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.38% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
AIOO vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIOO | DMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 2.34% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 3.38% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 3.38% | -1.32% |
AIOO vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIOO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIOO vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison
AIOO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF | 1.15% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIOO and DMAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AIOO.
DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for AIOO.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AIOO and 0.50% for DMAX.
Find the right allocation for AIOO and DMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer