PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIOO vs. FDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIOO vs. FDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOO achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than FDEC's 6.38% return.


AIOO

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.13%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDEC

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.64%
YTD
6.38%
6M
7.86%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIOO vs. FDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIOO and FDEC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIOO vs. FDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIOO

FDEC
FDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOO vs. FDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIOO vs. FDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIOOFDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.79

1.04

+1.75

Drawdowns

AIOO vs. FDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOO drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum FDEC drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOO and FDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIOOFDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-15.67%

+14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.19%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-2.57%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

AIOO vs. FDEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIOOFDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99%

7.62%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

11.21%

-9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.99%

11.01%

-9.02%

AIOO vs. FDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIOO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIOO vs. FDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOO nor FDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIOO and FDEC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FDEC.

AIOO and FDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AIOO and 0.85% for FDEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIOO and FDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer