AIOO vs. ZJUN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) and ZJUN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIOO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZJUN.

Performance

AIOO vs. ZJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOO achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than ZJUN's 1.66% return.

AIOO

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZJUN

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIOO vs. ZJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.13%	2.65%
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June	1.66%	2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AIOO and ZJUN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

AIOO vs. ZJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZJUN

ZJUN Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ZJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ZJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ZJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOO vs. ZJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIOO	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.58	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.97	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.59	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	25.50	—

Drawdowns

AIOO vs. ZJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOO drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum ZJUN drawdown of -1.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOO and ZJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIOO	ZJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	-1.08%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.75%	+0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.10%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIOO	ZJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06%	2.05%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.06%	2.04%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.06%	2.04%	+0.02%

AIOO vs. ZJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIOO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than ZJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIOO vs. ZJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOO nor ZJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIOO and ZJUN in my portfolio?

AIOO and ZJUN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIOO or ZJUN?

On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIOO or ZJUN?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIOO or ZJUN?

AIOO and ZJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AIOO and ZJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AIOO and 0.79% for ZJUN.