PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLDE vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLDE vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLDE achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 104.96% return.


YLDE

1D
0.76%
1M
0.40%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.81%
1Y
14.87%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*

FLKR

1D
-4.41%
1M
16.33%
YTD
104.96%
6M
121.64%
1Y
213.10%
3Y*
48.97%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YLDE vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
4.88%13.09%16.44%15.69%-8.56%22.12%10.35%32.46%-5.74%4.42%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
104.96%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between YLDE and FLKR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.41

The correlation between YLDE and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLDE vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YLDE
YLDE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
YLDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
YLDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YLDE vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YLDEFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.67

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

9.32

-7.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

34.49

-27.18

YLDE vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLDE and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YLDEFLKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

5.18

-3.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.65

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.53

+0.22

Drawdowns

YLDE vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLDE drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLDE and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDEFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-50.06%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-23.03%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

-26.39%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.22%

-49.51%

+29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-6.10%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-22.06%

+18.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

6.21%

-4.17%

Volatility

YLDE vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) is 1.90%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.38%. This indicates that YLDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDEFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

20.38%

-18.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

36.87%

-30.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

41.48%

-32.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

28.25%

-14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

27.60%

-11.84%

YLDE vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLDE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLDE vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

YLDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than FLKR's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.89%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
6.98%5.68%1.69%1.64%1.68%1.15%1.46%1.65%2.25%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLDE and FLKR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to YLDE (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLDE dropped -33.23% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 18.41% vs 9.71% for YLDE. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, YLDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 18.41% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for YLDE.

YLDE has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 1.89% for FLKR.

YLDE is categorized as Dividend, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for YLDE and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLDE and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer