YINN vs. GUSH

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - YINN is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while GUSH is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YINN returned -20.67%/yr vs -35.11%/yr for GUSH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.

Performance

YINN vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -33.90% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 77.98% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has outperformed GUSH with an annualized return of -20.67%, while GUSH has yielded a comparatively lower -35.11% annualized return.

YINN

• 1D: -3.53%
• 1M: 9.93%
• 6M: -35.93%
• YTD: -33.90%
• 1Y: -37.98%
• 3Y*: -5.40%
• 5Y*: -37.22%
• 10Y*: -20.67%
• ALL TIME*: -17.54%

GUSH

• 1D: 4.39%
• 1M: 28.50%
• 6M: 69.76%
• YTD: 77.98%
• 1Y: 73.50%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 19.43%
• 10Y*: -35.11%
• ALL TIME*: -42.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-33.90%	54.21%	36.06%	-53.08%	-71.97%	-58.56%	-7.75%	28.92%	-48.47%	129.79%
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	77.98%	-19.39%	-12.73%	-7.23%	66.47%	129.94%	-97.38%	-52.68%	-74.28%	-40.21%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and GUSH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between YINN and GUSH has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

YINN vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YINN	GUSH
Financial Services	35.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	25.3%	-
Communication Services	17.8%	-
Technology	5.9%	0.6%
Energy	4.8%	95.1%
Basic Materials	3.4%	4.3%
Industrials	2.8%	0.7%
Healthcare	2.6%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

YINN vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 4
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GUSH

GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 47
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YINN	GUSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	1.32	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	1.80	-2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.22	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.04	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	4.65	-5.88

YINN vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YINN vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, roughly equal to the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and GUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	YINN	GUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.87%	-99.98%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.64%	-36.18%	-25.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.08%	-63.59%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.93%	-73.64%	-21.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.59%	-99.94%	+1.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.66%	-99.78%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.69%	-92.96%	+24.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.89%	15.86%	+15.03%

Volatility

YINN vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 18.40% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 13.02%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YINN	GUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.40%	13.02%	+5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.29%	44.46%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.89%	56.42%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.28%	67.52%	+26.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.59%	92.98%	-11.39%

YINN vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

YINN vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than GUSH's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	1.22%	2.60%	2.96%	3.00%	0.47%	0.00%	0.20%	1.68%	0.17%	0.00%	3.26%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.35%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YINN and GUSH in my portfolio?

YINN and GUSH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YINN or GUSH?

YINN has higher volatility (18.40%) compared to GUSH (13.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

Which ETF is better, YINN or GUSH?

On 10-year performance, YINN leads with -20.67% vs -35.11% for GUSH. On fees, GUSH is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 13.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YINN or GUSH?

Over the 10-year period, YINN has performed better with a -20.67% return vs -35.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YINN or GUSH?

GUSH is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YINN or GUSH?

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.22% for GUSH.

What is the main difference between YINN and GUSH?

YINN is categorized as China Equities, while GUSH is Leveraged Equities. YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 1.17% for GUSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.