YINN vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%) while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YINN returned -38.06%/yr vs -4.29%/yr for FLCH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

YINN vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -35.64% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -8.52% return.

YINN

• 1D: 4.55%
• 1M: -8.89%
• 6M: -42.95%
• YTD: -35.64%
• 1Y: -36.89%
• 3Y*: -8.66%
• 5Y*: -38.06%
• 10Y*: -20.77%

FLCH

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -1.40%
• 6M: -13.12%
• YTD: -8.52%
• 1Y: -0.89%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: -4.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-35.64%	54.21%	36.06%	-53.08%	-71.97%	-58.56%	-7.75%	28.92%	-48.47%	3.09%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-8.52%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and FLCH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.96

The correlation between YINN and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

YINN vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YINN	FLCH
Financial Services	34.8%	18.3%
Consumer Cyclical	26.4%	20.0%
Communication Services	16.3%	14.9%
Technology	5.4%	13.9%
Energy	5.3%	3.3%
Basic Materials	3.9%	5.2%
Industrials	3.2%	11.1%
Healthcare	2.3%	5.7%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	3.2%
Utilities	0.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

YINN vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 4
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YINN	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	-0.05	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.67	0.07	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.01	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	-0.04	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-0.09	-1.13

YINN vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YINN vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	YINN	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.87%	-62.09%	-36.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.64%	-21.48%	-40.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.08%	-25.43%	-43.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.48%	-52.77%	-42.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.72%	-35.52%	-62.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.66%	-30.60%	-38.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.24%	9.59%	+20.65%

Volatility

YINN vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 18.79% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.01%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YINN	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.79%	6.01%	+12.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.66%	13.73%	+28.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.57%	19.69%	+39.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.21%	29.59%	+64.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.55%	27.81%	+53.74%

YINN vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

YINN vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than FLCH's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.37%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.39%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YINN and FLCH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, YINN and FLCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, YINN or FLCH?

YINN has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to FLCH (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, YINN or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, FLCH leads with -4.29% vs -38.06% for YINN. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YINN or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, FLCH has performed better with a -4.29% return vs -38.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YINN or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YINN or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.39% for YINN.

What is the main difference between YINN and FLCH?

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.