YFYA vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. YFYA is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. Over the past year, YFYA returned 5.38% vs 5.25% for CSHI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YFYA charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

YFYA vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YFYA having a 2.34% return and CSHI slightly lower at 2.26%.

YFYA

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF	2.34%	2.88%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.26%	4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and CSHI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	0.19

YFYA vs. CSHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YFYA	CSHI
Technology	36.9%	35.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	10.1%
Communication Services	11.1%	11.2%
Healthcare	9.2%	8.5%
Industrials	8.4%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	4.9%
Financial Services	5.1%	11.8%
Utilities	3.7%	2.3%
Energy	1.9%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

YFYA vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA

YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 61
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YFYA	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	6.16	-4.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	11.83	-9.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	2.75	-1.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	29.16	-25.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.29	154.18	-138.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YFYA vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YFYA	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	6.16	-4.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	4.18	-3.08

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	YFYA	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-1.69%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.61%	-0.18%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.33%	-0.03%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.03%	+0.32%

Volatility

YFYA vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 0.11%. This indicates that YFYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YFYA	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	0.11%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.35%	0.52%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.59%	0.86%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.59%	1.32%	+2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.59%	1.32%	+2.27%

YFYA vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

YFYA vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than CSHI's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF	5.14%	3.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YFYA and CSHI in my portfolio?

YFYA and CSHI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YFYA or CSHI?

YFYA has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to CSHI (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs CSHI's -1.69%.

Which ETF is better, YFYA or CSHI?

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs 5.25% for CSHI. On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YFYA or CSHI?

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YFYA or CSHI?

CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YFYA or CSHI?

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 4.90% for CSHI.

What is the main difference between YFYA and CSHI?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.38% for CSHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.