YFSNX vs. BGLTX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) and BGLTX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, YFSNX returned 8.52%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for BGLTX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YFSNX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for BGLTX.

Performance

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFSNX achieves a 24.04% return, which is significantly higher than BGLTX's -11.38% return.

YFSNX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 24.04%
• 6M: 27.19%
• 1Y: 23.43%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

BGLTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -11.38%
• 6M: -11.77%
• 1Y: -4.54%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: -1.29%
• 10Y*: 14.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	24.04%	14.79%	-0.47%	16.48%	-9.39%	13.00%	18.32%	24.48%	2.18%	20.95%
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	-11.38%	16.38%	25.03%	36.61%	-46.09%	2.47%	102.05%	33.53%	-1.37%	39.31%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSNX and BGLTX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.51

The correlation between YFSNX and BGLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YFSNX vs. BGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSNX

YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 21
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BGLTX

BGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YFSNX	BGLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	-0.31	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	-0.29	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.96	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	-0.24	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	-0.55	+5.79

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the BGLTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSNX and BGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, smaller than the maximum BGLTX drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and BGLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	YFSNX	BGLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.14%	-70.17%	+35.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.09%	-25.64%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-27.28%	+12.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-70.17%	+44.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	-18.45%	+15.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-16.03%	+11.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	11.25%	-6.75%

Volatility

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) at 3.60%. This indicates that YFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YFSNX	BGLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	3.60%	+2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.26%	15.63%	+5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.73%	20.48%	+1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	67.82%	-52.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.29%	51.04%	-34.75%

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than BGLTX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

YFSNX vs. BGLTX - Dividend Comparison

Neither YFSNX nor BGLTX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.84%	5.15%	8.39%	0.15%	10.07%	0.00%
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	0.00%	0.00%	8.40%	7.86%	4.33%	8.06%	4.71%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YFSNX and BGLTX in my portfolio?

YFSNX and BGLTX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YFSNX or BGLTX?

YFSNX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to BGLTX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs BGLTX's -70.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.