YFSNX vs. MGKQX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) and MGKQX (Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, YFSNX returned 8.83%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for MGKQX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. YFSNX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MGKQX.

Performance

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFSNX achieves a 24.78% return, which is significantly higher than MGKQX's 1.16% return.

YFSNX

• 1D: 3.07%
• 1M: 4.24%
• 6M: 13.98%
• YTD: 24.78%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 8.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.65%

MGKQX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: -0.73%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 1Y: -14.15%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	24.78%	14.79%	-0.47%	16.48%	-9.39%	13.00%	18.32%	8.41%
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio	1.16%	5.52%	10.81%	20.89%	-19.81%	19.55%	27.09%	6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSNX and MGKQX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2019	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between YFSNX and MGKQX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

YFSNX vs. MGKQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YFSNX

YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 28
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MGKQX

MGKQX Risk / Return Rank: 1
MGKQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MGKQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MGKQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MGKQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MGKQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YFSNX	MGKQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	-0.59	+1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	-0.57	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.90	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	-0.59	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	-0.96	+5.06

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the MGKQX Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSNX and MGKQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, which is greater than MGKQX's maximum drawdown of -33.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and MGKQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	YFSNX	MGKQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.14%	-33.07%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.09%	-25.97%	+11.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-25.97%	+11.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-30.96%	+5.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-19.64%	+17.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.94%	-8.81%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	15.99%	-11.15%

Volatility

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX) at 4.39%. This indicates that YFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YFSNX	MGKQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	4.39%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	15.01%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.56%	26.19%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	23.95%	-8.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	23.66%	-7.31%

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than MGKQX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Dividend Comparison

Neither YFSNX nor MGKQX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	21.29%	5.29%	1.80%	16.33%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	0.00%	0.00%	8.40%	7.86%	4.33%	8.06%	4.71%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YFSNX and MGKQX in my portfolio?

YFSNX and MGKQX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YFSNX or MGKQX?

YFSNX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to MGKQX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs MGKQX's -33.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.