YFSNX vs. MGKQX
YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) and MGKQX (Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, YFSNX returned 7.98%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for MGKQX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YFSNX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MGKQX.
Performance
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YFSNX achieves a 21.13% return, which is significantly higher than MGKQX's 1.99% return.
YFSNX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- YTD
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
MGKQX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- -14.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- —
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 21.13% | 14.79% | -0.47% | 16.48% | -9.39% | 13.00% | 18.32% | 8.41% |
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio | 1.99% | 5.52% | 10.81% | 20.89% | -19.81% | 19.55% | 27.09% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between YFSNX and MGKQX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2019 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between YFSNX and MGKQX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YFSNX vs. MGKQX — Risk / Return Rank
YFSNX
MGKQX
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YFSNX | MGKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.90 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | -0.57 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | -0.97 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, which is greater than MGKQX's maximum drawdown of -33.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and MGKQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YFSNX | MGKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.14% | -33.07% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.09% | -25.97% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -25.97% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -30.96% | +5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -18.98% | +13.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -8.71% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 15.23% | -10.54% |
Volatility
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX) at 5.75%. This indicates that YFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YFSNX | MGKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.75% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 15.06% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.21% | 25.99% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 23.93% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 23.72% | -7.39% |
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than MGKQX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Dividend Comparison
Neither YFSNX nor MGKQX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.29% | 5.29% | 1.80% | 16.33% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 4.33% | 8.06% | 4.71% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YFSNX and MGKQX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSNX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to MGKQX (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs MGKQX's -33.07%.
YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YFSNX and MGKQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer