PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFSNX vs. MGKQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFSNX achieves a 24.04% return, which is significantly higher than MGKQX's -0.91% return.


YFSNX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.04%
YTD
24.04%
6M
27.19%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

MGKQX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.27%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
-2.21%
1Y
-15.26%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
24.04%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%13.00%18.32%8.41%
MGKQX
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio
-0.91%5.52%10.81%20.89%-19.81%19.55%27.09%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSNX and MGKQX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2019

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between YFSNX and MGKQX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFSNX vs. MGKQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MGKQX
MGKQX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MGKQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGKQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGKQX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MGKQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGKQX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFSNXMGKQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.90

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

-0.59

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.24

-1.06

+6.30

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the MGKQX Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSNX and MGKQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, which is greater than MGKQX's maximum drawdown of -33.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and MGKQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFSNXMGKQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

-33.07%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.09%

-25.97%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-25.97%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-30.96%

+5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-21.29%

+18.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-8.62%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

14.48%

-9.98%

Volatility

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFSNXMGKQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

6.55%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.26%

25.01%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.73%

25.88%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

23.89%

-8.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

23.77%

-7.48%

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than MGKQX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFSNX vs. MGKQX - Dividend Comparison

Neither YFSNX nor MGKQX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGKQX
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio
0.00%0.00%21.29%5.29%1.80%16.33%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFSNX and MGKQX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGKQX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to YFSNX (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs MGKQX's -33.07%.

YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFSNX and MGKQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer