PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
YANG vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

YANG vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - YANG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YANG returned -38.75%/yr vs 5.38%/yr for ASHR. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. YANG charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

YANG vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YANG achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, YANG has underperformed ASHR with an annualized return of -38.75%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.38% annualized return.

YANG

1D
6.57%
1M
6.76%
YTD
18.42%
6M
23.43%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
-47.01%
5Y*
-33.76%
10Y*
-38.75%

ASHR

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.11%
6M
13.67%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YANG vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares		18.42%-62.77%-71.41%11.95%-41.34%25.90%-58.66%-40.72%13.14%-64.93%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		10.11%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between YANG and ASHR is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

-0.72

The correlation between YANG and ASHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund

Often compared with YANG:
YANG vs. YINNYANG vs. CWEBYANG vs. FXPYANG vs. GLLYANG vs. TYOYANG vs. KLIPYANG vs. EDZ
Often compared with ASHR:
ASHR vs. MCHIASHR vs. FXIASHR vs. CNYAASHR vs. ASHSASHR vs. SPYASHR vs. GXCASHR vs. CHAU

Return for Risk

YANG vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
YANG
YANG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
YANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
YANG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
YANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
YANG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YANG vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

YANGASHRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

2.33

-2.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.08

3.23

-3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

5.10

-5.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.53

15.76

-16.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YANG vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YANG and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

YANGASHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

2.33

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

-0.05

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.47

0.22

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.23

-0.71

Drawdowns

YANG vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YANG drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YANG and ASHR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

YANGASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-51.30%

-48.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.85%

-7.69%

-31.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.02%

-33.12%

-60.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.38%

-45.76%

-51.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.53%

-51.30%

-48.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-15.63%

-84.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.52%

-29.18%

-61.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.12%

2.49%

+23.63%

Volatility

YANG vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) has a higher volatility of 21.22% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 5.87%. This indicates that YANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

YANGASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.22%

5.87%

+15.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.63%

11.53%

+31.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.83%

16.84%

+41.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.44%

23.89%

+70.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.12%

24.06%

+58.06%

YANG vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

YANG vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than ASHR's 2.10% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		2.10%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares		3.45%4.03%9.42%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.67%1.54%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

YANG and ASHR have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YANG has higher volatility (21.22%) compared to ASHR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YANG dropped -99.98% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

On 10-year performance, ASHR leads with 5.38% vs -38.75% for YANG. On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASHR has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ASHR has performed better with a 5.38% return vs -38.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.

YANG has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 2.10% for ASHR.

YANG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASHR is China Equities. YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and DWS. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YANG and 0.65% for ASHR.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YANG and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer