XXXX vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - XXXX tracks the S&P 500 Index (400%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XXXX returned 53.60% vs 87.62% for NRGU. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XXXX charges 2.95%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

XXXX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 74.97% return.

XXXX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -11.06%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 53.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: -13.53%
• YTD: 74.97%
• 6M: 78.13%
• 1Y: 87.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXXX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	13.49%	3.34%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	74.97%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and NRGU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.08

The correlation between XXXX and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XXXX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX

XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 34
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 38
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXXX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XXXX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.16	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	1.76	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	2.06	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.32	4.94	+0.38

XXXX vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXXX	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.27%	-57.50%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.25%	-42.71%	+5.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.76%	-39.65%	+24.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.56%	-25.68%	+14.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.10%	17.80%	-7.70%

Volatility

XXXX vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) is 19.26%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 25.61%. This indicates that XXXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XXXX	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.26%	25.61%	-6.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.05%	62.83%	-23.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.16%	75.96%	-26.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.09%	89.05%	-27.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.09%	89.05%	-27.96%

XXXX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXXX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXXX and NRGU in my portfolio?

XXXX and NRGU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XXXX or NRGU?

NRGU has higher volatility (25.61%) compared to XXXX (19.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXXX dropped -62.27% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, XXXX or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 87.62% vs 53.60% for XXXX. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XXXX has been the lower-risk option at 19.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XXXX or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 87.62% return vs 53.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXXX or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XXXX or NRGU?

XXXX and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XXXX and NRGU?

XXXX tracks S&P 500 Index (400%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Max and BMO. Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.