XXXX vs. FNGU

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - XXXX tracks the S&P 500 Index (400%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XXXX returned 24.99% vs -7.32% for FNGU. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XXXX charges 2.95%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

XXXX vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -7.21% return.

XXXX

• 1D: -6.36%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 1.73%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 1Y: 24.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 38.66%

FNGU

• 1D: -4.72%
• 1M: -7.13%
• 6M: -1.55%
• YTD: -7.21%
• 1Y: -7.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	$92.82M	$119.47M	$156.33M
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	$19.76M	$23.75M	$27.68M

XXXX vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	7.44%	3.34%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	-7.21%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and FNGU is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.80

The correlation between XXXX and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XXXX vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX

XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 24
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 10
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXXX vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XXXX	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	-0.11	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	0.29	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.04	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	-0.12	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.36	-0.28	+2.63

XXXX vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGU drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXXX	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.27%	-61.30%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.25%	-59.55%	+22.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.31%	-35.16%	+15.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.54%	-22.58%	+11.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.64%	26.57%	-15.93%

Volatility

XXXX vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) is 12.64%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 15.56%. This indicates that XXXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XXXX	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.64%	15.56%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.70%	53.10%	-13.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.49%	65.17%	-14.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.64%	79.50%	-18.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.64%	79.50%	-18.86%

XXXX vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXXX vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXXX and FNGU in my portfolio?

XXXX and FNGU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XXXX or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (15.56%) compared to XXXX (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXXX dropped -62.27% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, XXXX or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 24.99% vs -7.32% for FNGU. On fees, FNGU is cheaper at 2.60% per year. On volatility, XXXX has been the lower-risk option at 12.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XXXX or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 24.99% return vs -7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXXX or FNGU?

FNGU is cheaper with a 2.60% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XXXX or FNGU?

XXXX and FNGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XXXX and FNGU?

XXXX tracks S&P 500 Index (400%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Max and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XXXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.