XXXX vs. CARD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - XXXX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (400%), while CARD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XXXX returned 61.35% vs -30.65% for CARD. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. XXXX charges 2.95%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.

Performance

XXXX vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's 5.96% return.

XXXX

• 1D: -5.65%
• 1M: -8.58%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 6M: 9.18%
• 1Y: 61.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARD

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 16.67%
• 1Y: -30.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXXX vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	13.89%	17.36%	61.36%	16.77%
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	5.96%	-60.21%	-58.19%	-28.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and CARD is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023	-0.68

The correlation between XXXX and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XXXX vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX

XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 36
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CARD

CARD Risk / Return Rank: 5
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXXX vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XXXX	CARD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.44	+1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	-0.25	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.97	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	-0.66	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	-0.97	+7.12

XXXX vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and CARD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXXX	CARD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.27%	-93.51%	+31.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.25%	-46.42%	+9.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.46%	-92.04%	+77.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.55%	-68.71%	+57.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.02%	31.50%	-21.48%

Volatility

XXXX vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) is 19.57%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 24.36%. This indicates that XXXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XXXX	CARD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.57%	24.36%	-4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.25%	52.63%	-13.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.48%	70.25%	-20.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.18%	80.74%	-19.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.18%	80.74%	-19.56%

XXXX vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXXX vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor CARD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXXX and CARD in my portfolio?

XXXX and CARD have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XXXX or CARD?

CARD has higher volatility (24.36%) compared to XXXX (19.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXXX dropped -62.27% vs CARD's -93.51%.

Which ETF is better, XXXX or CARD?

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 61.35% vs -30.65% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XXXX has been the lower-risk option at 19.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XXXX or CARD?

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 61.35% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXXX or CARD?

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XXXX or CARD?

XXXX and CARD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XXXX and CARD?

XXXX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CARD is Inverse Equities. XXXX tracks S&P 500 Index (400%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 0.95% for CARD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XXXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.