PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARD vs. BNKD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CARD vs. BNKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CARD vs. BNKD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly higher than BNKD's 7.72% return.


CARD

1D
-10.04%
1M
20.30%
YTD
27.01%
6M
23.34%
1Y
-54.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNKD

1D
-10.54%
1M
1.51%
YTD
7.72%
6M
-19.30%
1Y
-68.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARD vs. BNKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CARD and BNKD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

CARD vs. BNKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BNKD
BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARD vs. BNKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARDBNKDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

-0.91

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.70

-1.72

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.80

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.83

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

-1.02

+0.17

CARD vs. BNKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is comparable to the BNKD Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARD and BNKD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARDBNKDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

-0.91

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.62

-0.72

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between CARD and BNKD is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CARD vs. BNKD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CARD nor BNKD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CARD vs. BNKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, which is greater than BNKD's maximum drawdown of -84.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and BNKD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CARDBNKDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.51%

-84.27%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.41%

-84.27%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.46%

-78.83%

-11.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.62%

-61.01%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.55%

68.67%

-3.12%

Volatility

CARD vs. BNKD - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 25.18% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) at 19.01%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CARDBNKDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.18%

19.01%

+6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.70%

45.69%

+7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.47%

75.20%

+7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.97%

77.02%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.97%

77.02%

+3.95%