PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUDV vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUDV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly higher than RDIV's 11.95% return.


XUDV

1D
-1.47%
1M
4.20%
YTD
19.02%
6M
19.23%
1Y
29.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDIV

1D
-1.30%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.95%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUDV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XUDV and RDIV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.84

The correlation between XUDV and RDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUDV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUDV
RDIV

Financial Services

25.3%
18.0%

Technology

15.1%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.3%
15.9%

Industrials

9.2%

-

Healthcare

8.7%
7.8%

Energy

7.6%
28.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
9.5%

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Utilities

4.3%
6.4%

Basic Materials

3.3%
0.5%

Real Estate

-

8.0%

Financial Services

XUDV
25.3%
RDIV
18.0%

Technology

XUDV
15.1%
RDIV
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

XUDV
13.3%
RDIV
15.9%

Industrials

XUDV
9.2%
RDIV

-

Healthcare

XUDV
8.7%
RDIV
7.8%

Energy

XUDV
7.6%
RDIV
28.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XUDV
7.1%
RDIV
9.5%

Communication Services

XUDV
6.2%
RDIV

-

Utilities

XUDV
4.3%
RDIV
6.4%

Basic Materials

XUDV
3.3%
RDIV
0.5%

Real Estate

XUDV

-

RDIV
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUDV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUDV
XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUDV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUDVRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

5.61

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.94

16.50

-0.56

XUDV vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUDV and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUDVRDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.06

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.55

+0.72

Drawdowns

XUDV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUDVRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-49.97%

+33.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-4.84%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.65%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-5.86%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.65%

+0.21%

Volatility

XUDV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 3.46%. This indicates that XUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUDVRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.46%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

8.62%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

13.23%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

17.53%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

21.89%

-5.55%

XUDV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUDV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than RDIV's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.66%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
XUDV
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
3.48%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUDV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XUDV has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to RDIV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 1-year performance, XUDV leads with 29.58% vs 27.04% for RDIV. On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XUDV has performed better with a 29.58% return vs 27.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 3.48% for XUDV.

XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.39% for RDIV.

XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUDV and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer