XTN vs. CSX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and CSX Corporation (CSX).

XTN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011.

Performance

XTN vs. CSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and CSX Corporation (CSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XTN vs. CSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	2.02%	6.33%	4.86%	25.22%	-28.10%	33.68%	12.11%	21.85%	-17.26%	21.55%
CSX CSX Corporation	13.61%	14.13%	-5.65%	13.51%	-16.58%	25.70%	27.09%	18.06%	14.47%	55.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than CSX's 13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, XTN has underperformed CSX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while CSX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.70% annualized return.

XTN

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 26.99%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 8.43%

CSX

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 16.41%
• 1Y: 41.61%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: 6.26%
• 10Y*: 18.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XTN vs. CSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTN

XTN Risk / Return Rank: 52
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CSX

CSX Risk / Return Rank: 87
CSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CSX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTN vs. CSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and CSX Corporation (CSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTN	CSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.75	-0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.43	-1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.32	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	3.63	-2.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	9.03	-4.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTN vs. CSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and CSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTN	CSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	1.75	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.27	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.68	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.42	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and CSX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XTN vs. CSX - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than CSX's 1.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	0.79%	0.78%	0.93%	0.73%	1.04%	1.02%	0.75%	1.17%	0.98%	0.63%	0.66%	1.03%
CSX CSX Corporation	1.29%	1.43%	1.49%	1.27%	1.29%	0.99%	1.15%	1.33%	1.42%	1.42%	2.00%	2.70%

Drawdowns

XTN vs. CSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum CSX drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and CSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTN	CSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.77%	-69.19%	+25.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.28%	-11.89%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.05%	-29.44%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.77%	-40.55%	-3.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.15%	-4.91%	-7.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.97%	-15.98%	+5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	4.78%	+1.01%

Volatility

XTN vs. CSX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to CSX Corporation (CSX) at 8.57%. This indicates that XTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTN	CSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.95%	8.57%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.35%	14.56%	+4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.25%	23.90%	+8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.20%	23.21%	+2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.88%	27.77%	-1.89%