XTN vs. BOAT
XTN (SPDR S&P Transportation ETF) and BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) are both Transportation Equities funds - XTN tracks the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index while BOAT tracks the Solactive Global Shipping Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTN returned 14.95%/yr vs 27.56%/yr for BOAT. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BOAT.
Performance
XTN vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 29.73% return.
XTN
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 22.93%
- 1Y
- 44.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
BOAT
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 29.73%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 49.09%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTN vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 21.64% | 6.33% | 4.86% | 25.22% | -28.10% | 15.36% |
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 29.73% | 22.77% | 5.97% | 24.53% | 6.26% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTN and BOAT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between XTN and BOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XTN vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTN
BOAT
Industrials
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XTN
BOAT
Technology
XTN
BOAT
-
Basic Materials
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Communication Services
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Consumer Defensive
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Energy
XTN
-
BOAT
Financial Services
XTN
-
BOAT
Healthcare
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Real Estate
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Utilities
XTN
-
BOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTN vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank
XTN
BOAT
XTN vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTN | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 2.50 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 3.30 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 4.25 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 13.13 | -5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTN | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.50 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.93 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
XTN vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, which is greater than BOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and BOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTN | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.77% | -33.94% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -11.60% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.69% | -33.94% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -6.70% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -9.70% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.25% | 3.75% | +2.50% |
Volatility
XTN vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) have volatilities of 7.36% and 7.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTN | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 7.60% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 15.34% | +6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 19.77% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.83% | 25.12% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.19% | 25.12% | +1.07% |
XTN vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTN vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison
XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than BOAT's 6.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 6.32% | 8.08% | 13.89% | 13.65% | 13.57% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 0.66% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.73% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 0.98% | 0.63% | 0.66% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTN and BOAT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOAT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to XTN (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs BOAT's -33.94%.
On 3-year performance, BOAT leads with 27.56% vs 14.95% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 27.56% return vs 14.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BOAT.
BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.66% for XTN.
XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while BOAT tracks Solactive Global Shipping Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.69% for BOAT.
BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTN and BOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer