XTL vs. VEA
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 16.27%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
XTL vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 51.28% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 16.27%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.
XTL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 51.28%
- 6M
- 51.62%
- 1Y
- 120.42%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
XTL vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.28% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and VEA is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XTL and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTL vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTL
VEA
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XTL
VEA
Communication Services
XTL
VEA
Real Estate
XTL
VEA
Basic Materials
XTL
-
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
XTL
-
VEA
Consumer Defensive
XTL
-
VEA
Energy
XTL
-
VEA
Financial Services
XTL
-
VEA
Healthcare
XTL
-
VEA
Industrials
XTL
-
VEA
Utilities
XTL
-
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
VEA
XTL vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.33 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.95 | 2.58 | +5.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.56 | 9.92 | +23.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTL vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -60.68% | +23.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -11.63% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -13.45% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | -29.71% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | -35.73% | -1.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -1.06% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -13.28% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 3.02% | +0.46% |
Volatility
XTL vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.84%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 6.84% | +4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 14.38% | +9.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 16.58% | +13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 16.72% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 17.40% | +6.26% |
XTL vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTL vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and VEA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to VEA (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.27% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XTL.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.03% for VEA.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTL and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer