XTL vs. GOLS
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. XTL is passively managed, while GOLS is actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.
Performance
XTL vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XTL
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 43.56%
- 6M
- 40.96%
- 1Y
- 97.96%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
GOLS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTL vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 43.56% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and GOLS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. GOLS — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
GOLS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTL vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTL | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.85 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTL vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and GOLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -7.85% | -29.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -3.83% | -7.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -1.96% | -7.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | — | — |
Volatility
XTL vs. GOLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.22% | 13.74% | +16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 13.74% | +11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 13.74% | +9.92% |
XTL vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTL vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 1.22% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and GOLS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.90% for GOLS.
Find the right allocation for XTL and GOLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer