XT vs. METV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while METV tracks the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XT returned 6.52%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for METV. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for METV.

Performance

XT vs. METV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than METV's -0.80% return.

XT

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -2.33%
• 6M: 11.05%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 1Y: 33.19%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: 13.72%
• ALL TIME*: 12.32%

METV

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: 4.49%
• YTD: -0.80%
• 1Y: 5.32%
• 3Y*: 21.74%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	$768.98K	$888.91K	$961.66K
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	$6.36M	$6.26M	$10.28M

XT vs. METV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	15.68%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	4.48%
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	-0.80%	30.83%	24.93%	60.57%	-52.66%	0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and METV is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.88

The correlation between XT and METV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XT vs. METV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XT	METV
Technology	42.9%	54.1%
Healthcare	28.5%	-
Industrials	8.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	7.7%
Utilities	4.9%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	17.7%
Financial Services	3.2%	3.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Energy	0.1%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

XT vs. METV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 79
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 15
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 16
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XT vs. METV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XT	METV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	0.21	+1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	0.46	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.06	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	0.19	+3.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	0.40	+11.05

XT vs. METV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the METV Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and METV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XT vs. METV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum METV drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and METV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XT	METV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-59.64%	+25.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-28.27%	+17.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.09%	-28.27%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	-59.64%	+25.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-12.26%	+8.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-25.56%	+18.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	13.36%	-10.46%

Volatility

XT vs. METV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 5.03%, while Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XT	METV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	6.40%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.41%	19.48%	-5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	25.37%	-7.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.09%	30.10%	-9.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.13%	29.89%	-9.76%

XT vs. METV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than METV's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XT vs. METV - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than METV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	7.08%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XT and METV in my portfolio?

XT and METV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XT or METV?

METV has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to XT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs METV's -59.64%.

Which ETF is better, XT or METV?

On 5-year performance, XT leads with 6.52% vs 4.91% for METV. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XT or METV?

Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 6.52% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XT or METV?

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XT or METV?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

What is the main difference between XT and METV?

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.75% for METV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.