PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSW vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSW vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 13.33%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.


XSW

1D
-4.18%
1M
9.35%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-7.49%
1Y
-4.24%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
13.33%

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
-6.38%-0.90%25.81%38.60%-34.22%7.47%52.41%36.50%7.67%27.94%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and XLU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011

0.20

The correlation between XSW and XLU shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSW vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSW
XLU

Technology

86.5%

-

Financial Services

8.1%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Industrials

0.8%

-

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Technology

XSW
86.5%
XLU

-

Financial Services

XSW
8.1%
XLU

-

Communication Services

XSW
2.9%
XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSW
1.0%
XLU

-

Industrials

XSW
0.8%
XLU

-

Healthcare

XSW
0.7%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

XSW

-

XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

XSW

-

XLU

-

Energy

XSW

-

XLU

-

Real Estate

XSW

-

XLU

-

Utilities

XSW

-

XLU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSW vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW
XSW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSWXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.12

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

1.00

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

2.24

-2.51

XSW vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSWXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.63

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.54

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.48

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.40

+0.23

Drawdowns

XSW vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSWXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-51.98%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.75%

-9.18%

-24.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.75%

-17.26%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-25.26%

-20.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

-36.07%

-9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.64%

-7.78%

-6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-10.22%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

4.09%

+11.62%

Volatility

XSW vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.41%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSWXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

5.41%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.51%

11.53%

+11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

14.57%

+14.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.79%

17.32%

+11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

19.26%

+6.99%

XSW vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSW vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
0.04%0.06%0.07%0.20%0.09%0.13%0.26%0.12%0.31%0.46%0.87%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSW and XLU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSW has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XSW leads with 13.33% vs 9.15% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSW has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.04% for XSW.

XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.08% for XLU.

XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSW and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer