XSW vs. STHH
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XSW returned -4.24% vs 209.77% for STHH. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
XSW vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.
XSW
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -7.49%
- 1Y
- -4.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
STHH
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 45.30%
- YTD
- 209.56%
- 6M
- 210.55%
- 1Y
- 209.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSW vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -6.38% | 20.62% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 209.56% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and STHH is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
STHH
XSW vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSW | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 4.20 | -4.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 4.20 | -4.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.60 | -0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 6.23 | -6.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 14.15 | -14.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSW | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 4.20 | -4.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 4.44 | -3.81 |
Drawdowns
XSW vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -33.89% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -33.89% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.64% | 0.00% | -14.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -10.46% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 14.90% | +0.81% |
Volatility
XSW vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 10.68%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 20.33% | -9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.51% | 36.77% | -13.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 50.39% | -21.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 49.44% | -20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 49.44% | -23.19% |
XSW vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than STHH's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and STHH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to XSW (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs STHH's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs -4.24% for XSW. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs -4.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.04% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.19% for STHH.
STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer