XSW vs. SPYM
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 12.80%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for SPYM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XSW vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 12.80%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
SPYM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
XSW vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -13.68% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.21% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and SPYM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XSW and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSW vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
SPYM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSW
SPYM
Financial Services
XSW
SPYM
Communication Services
XSW
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
SPYM
Healthcare
XSW
SPYM
Industrials
XSW
SPYM
Basic Materials
XSW
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
SPYM
Energy
XSW
-
SPYM
Real Estate
XSW
-
SPYM
Utilities
XSW
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
SPYM
XSW vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.35 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 2.68 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 11.98 | -12.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -54.46% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -8.90% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -18.72% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -24.48% | -20.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -33.87% | -11.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -3.14% | -18.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -7.14% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 1.99% | +14.32% |
Volatility
XSW vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.83%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 4.83% | +6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 9.83% | +13.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 12.46% | +16.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 16.90% | +11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 18.03% | +8.23% |
XSW vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.30% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and SPYM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer