XSW vs. QTUM
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSW returned 1.69%/yr vs 29.15%/yr for QTUM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
XSW vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.29% return.
XSW
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -7.49%
- 1Y
- -4.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
XSW vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -6.38% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | -16.76% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and QTUM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XSW and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSW vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
QTUM
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
QTUM
Financial Services
XSW
QTUM
-
Communication Services
XSW
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
QTUM
Industrials
XSW
QTUM
Healthcare
XSW
QTUM
Basic Materials
XSW
-
QTUM
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
QTUM
-
Energy
XSW
-
QTUM
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
QTUM
-
Utilities
XSW
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
QTUM
XSW vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSW | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 3.65 | -3.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 4.26 | -4.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.55 | -0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 6.28 | -6.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 23.69 | -23.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSW | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 3.65 | -3.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 1.10 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.08 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
XSW vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -38.45% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -15.26% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -25.39% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -38.45% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.64% | -0.59% | -14.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -8.25% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 4.04% | +11.67% |
Volatility
XSW vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.76%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 9.76% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.51% | 20.35% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 26.26% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 26.56% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 27.17% | -0.92% |
XSW vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and QTUM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 1.69% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.04% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer