PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSW vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSW vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.29% return.


XSW

1D
-4.18%
1M
9.35%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-7.49%
1Y
-4.24%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
13.33%

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
-6.38%-0.90%25.81%38.60%-34.22%7.47%52.41%36.50%-16.76%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and QTUM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.78

The correlation between XSW and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSW vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSW
QTUM

Technology

86.5%
84.2%

Financial Services

8.1%

-

Communication Services

2.9%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
0.8%

Industrials

0.8%
9.0%

Healthcare

0.7%
0.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XSW
86.5%
QTUM
84.2%

Financial Services

XSW
8.1%
QTUM

-

Communication Services

XSW
2.9%
QTUM
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XSW
1.0%
QTUM
0.8%

Industrials

XSW
0.8%
QTUM
9.0%

Healthcare

XSW
0.7%
QTUM
0.7%

Basic Materials

XSW

-

QTUM

-

Consumer Defensive

XSW

-

QTUM

-

Energy

XSW

-

QTUM

-

Real Estate

XSW

-

QTUM

-

Utilities

XSW

-

QTUM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSW vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW
XSW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSWQTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

3.65

-3.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.01

4.26

-4.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.55

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

6.28

-6.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.27

23.69

-23.96

XSW vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSWQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

3.65

-3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.10

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.08

-0.45

Drawdowns

XSW vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSWQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-38.45%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.75%

-15.26%

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.75%

-25.39%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-38.45%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.64%

-0.59%

-14.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-8.25%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

4.04%

+11.67%

Volatility

XSW vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.76%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSWQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

9.76%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.51%

20.35%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

26.26%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.79%

26.56%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

27.17%

-0.92%

XSW vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSW vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
0.04%0.06%0.07%0.20%0.09%0.13%0.26%0.12%0.31%0.46%0.87%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSW and QTUM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSW has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 1.69% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.04% for XSW.

XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSW and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer