XSVN vs. XCCC
XSVN (BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVN is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index, while XCCC is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSVN returned 2.75%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for XCCC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSVN charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XCCC.
Performance
XSVN vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVN achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than XCCC's -0.05% return.
XSVN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 2.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCCC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSVN vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVN BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | -0.57% | 8.18% | -0.35% | 3.91% | -1.71% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.05% | 7.25% | 13.01% | 20.57% | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVN and XCCC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVN vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank
XSVN
XCCC
XSVN vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSVN | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.11 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 3.72 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSVN | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.09 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.96 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
XSVN vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVN drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, smaller than the maximum XCCC drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVN and XCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVN | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -10.99% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | -5.11% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.09% | -10.99% | +3.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -1.05% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -1.93% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 1.53% | -0.20% |
Volatility
XSVN vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVN | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.51% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 4.02% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65% | 5.25% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 8.82% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 8.82% | -1.63% |
XSVN vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVN vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison
XSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than XCCC's 10.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.05% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% |
XSVN BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.10% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.49% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVN and XCCC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVN has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to XCCC (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVN dropped -9.45% vs XCCC's -10.99%.
On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.79% vs 2.75% for XSVN. On fees, XSVN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 2.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 4.10% for XSVN.
XSVN is categorized as Government Bonds, while XCCC is High Yield Bonds. XSVN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index, while XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XSVN and 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVN and XCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer