XSVN vs. BIV
XSVN (BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVN is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index, while BIV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSVN returned 2.78%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for BIV. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XSVN charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
XSVN vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVN achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than BIV's -0.11% return.
XSVN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 2.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
XSVN vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVN BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | -0.45% | 8.18% | -0.35% | 3.91% | -1.71% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.11% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVN and BIV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between XSVN and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVN vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
XSVN
BIV
XSVN vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSVN | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.37 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 4.13 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSVN | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.08 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.65 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
XSVN vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVN drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVN and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVN | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -18.95% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | -3.18% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.09% | -6.07% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -1.91% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -3.39% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 1.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility
XSVN vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.36%. This indicates that XSVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVN | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.36% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 2.90% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.64% | 4.06% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 6.40% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 5.50% | +1.69% |
XSVN vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSVN vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
XSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than BIV's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.21% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
XSVN BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.10% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.49% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, XSVN and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XSVN has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to BIV (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVN dropped -9.45% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 3-year performance, BIV leads with 4.34% vs 2.78% for XSVN. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BIV has performed better with a 4.34% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for XSVN.
BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 4.10% for XSVN.
XSVN is categorized as Government Bonds, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. XSVN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XSVN and 0.03% for BIV.
BIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVN and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer