XCCC vs. SHV
Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV).
XCCC and SHV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCCC is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on May 24, 2022. SHV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Short Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both XCCC and SHV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCCC vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCCC vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -2.95% | 7.25% | 13.01% | 20.57% | -5.33% |
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 0.81% return.
XCCC
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -2.95%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCCC vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCCC vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
XCCC
SHV
XCCC vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCCC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 19.56 | -18.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | 153.08 | -152.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 55.01 | -53.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 441.03 | -440.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 2,478.85 | -2,475.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCCC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 19.56 | -18.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 11.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 7.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 4.43 | -3.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCCC and SHV is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCCC vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than SHV's 3.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.23% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF | 3.98% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
XCCC vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and SHV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCCC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -0.45% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -0.01% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | 0.00% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -0.03% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 0.00% | +1.87% |
Volatility
XCCC vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCCC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 0.05% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.10% | 0.13% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 0.21% | +9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 0.29% | +8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 0.28% | +8.67% |