PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVM vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVM vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 27.31% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 18.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XSVM has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 13.04%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.


XSVM

1D
1.19%
1M
3.59%
6M
17.18%
YTD
27.31%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
13.04%
ALL TIME*
9.38%

XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M
$2.64M$2.37M$2.08M

XSVM vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
27.31%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.13%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and XMVM is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.87

The correlation between XSVM and XMVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSVM vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSVM
XMVM

Financial Services

45.1%
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

18.1%
14.8%

Real Estate

9.7%
4.9%

Energy

5.7%
13.5%

Industrials

5.3%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
1.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.8%

Technology

2.6%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
0.9%

Utilities

2.1%
8.5%

Healthcare

1.7%
2.5%

Financial Services

XSVM
45.1%
XMVM
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XSVM
18.1%
XMVM
14.8%

Real Estate

XSVM
9.7%
XMVM
4.9%

Energy

XSVM
5.7%
XMVM
13.5%

Industrials

XSVM
5.3%
XMVM
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

XSVM
4.1%
XMVM
1.2%

Basic Materials

XSVM
3.0%
XMVM
0.8%

Technology

XSVM
2.6%
XMVM
5.1%

Communication Services

XSVM
2.6%
XMVM
0.9%

Utilities

XSVM
2.1%
XMVM
8.5%

Healthcare

XSVM
1.7%
XMVM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVM vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSVM vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSVMXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

4.28

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

13.71

+0.08

XSVM vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVMXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-62.83%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-9.18%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

-24.12%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-24.12%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

-45.07%

-3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.12%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-10.19%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.86%

+0.29%

Volatility

XSVM vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that XSVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVMXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.30%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

9.25%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

14.72%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

21.24%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.01%

22.74%

+2.27%

XSVM vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVM vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than XMVM's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.73%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSVM and XMVM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSVM has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.04% vs 12.28% for XMVM. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.73% for XSVM.

XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVM and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer