XSVM vs. SYLD
XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. XSVM is passively managed, while SYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSVM returned 13.23%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SYLD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
XSVM vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than SYLD's 17.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSVM having a 13.23% annualized return and SYLD not far ahead at 13.58%.
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 42.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
XSVM vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 21.88% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 17.19% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and SYLD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XSVM and SYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSVM vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSVM
SYLD
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSVM
SYLD
Consumer Cyclical
XSVM
SYLD
Energy
XSVM
SYLD
Technology
XSVM
SYLD
Consumer Defensive
XSVM
SYLD
Industrials
XSVM
SYLD
Real Estate
XSVM
SYLD
-
Communication Services
XSVM
SYLD
Basic Materials
XSVM
SYLD
Healthcare
XSVM
SYLD
Utilities
XSVM
SYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVM vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
XSVM
SYLD
XSVM vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSVM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 4.07 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 11.04 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than SYLD's maximum drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -45.36% | -17.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -6.93% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | -26.62% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -26.62% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.02% | -45.36% | -3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -5.65% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 2.55% | +0.71% |
Volatility
XSVM vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.35%. This indicates that XSVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 3.35% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 9.75% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 15.59% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 20.61% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 22.95% | +2.13% |
XSVM vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVM vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than SYLD's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.81% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVM and SYLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to SYLD (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.58% vs 13.23% for XSVM. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.74% for XSVM.
XSVM is categorized as Momentum, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.59% for SYLD.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVM and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer